• Koleksi
  • Informasi
Menara DDTC, Lantai 2 Jl. Raya Boulevard Barat Blok XC 5-6 No. B, Kelapa Gading Barat, Kelapa Gading, Jakarta Utara, 14240 - IndonesiaMenara DDTC, Lantai 2
Jl. Raya Boulevard Barat Blok XC 5-6 No. B, Kelapa Gading Barat, Kelapa Gading, Jakarta Utara, 14240 - Indonesia
Tentang DDTC Library
  • Beranda
  • Koleksi
  • Informasi
Jam Kerja
  • Senin - Jumat:
    09:00 - 17:00 WIB
  • Istirahat:
    12:00 - 13:00 WIB
Kontak
  • Hotline:
    +62-21-2938-2700
  • Email:
    [email protected]
Copyright © 2025 Created internally by DDTC Digital Transformation Team. All rights reserved.
Parallax background
Cover per_Reconsidering.jpg.jpg
Book

Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution

Louis Fisher
Tersedia
Salinan:
1/1
Lihat ketersediaan buku
4359-x
Tersedia

Bagikan Buku Ini:

Informasi:

Hubungi Kami
Lihat Lokasi
Baca Peraturan
Federal judges, legal scholars, pundits, and reporters frequently describe the Supreme Court as the final word on the meaning of the Constitution. The historical record presents an entirely different picture. A close and revealing reading of that record, from 1789 to the present day, Reconsidering Judicial Finality reminds us of the “unalterable fact,” as Chief Justice Rehnquist once remarked, “that our judicial system, like the human beings who administer it, is fallible.” And a Court inevitably prone to miscalculation and error, as this book clearly demonstrates, cannot have the incontrovertible last word on constitutional questions. In this deeply researched, sharply reasoned work of legal myth-busting, constitutional scholar Louis Fisher explains how constitutional disputes are settled by all three branches of government, and by the general public, with the Supreme Court often playing a secondary role. The Court’s decisions have, of course, been challenged and reversed in numerous cases—involving slavery, civil rights, child labor legislation, Japanese internment during World War II, abortion, and religious liberty. What Fisher shows us on a case-by-case basis is how the elected branches, scholars, and American public regularly press policies contrary to Court rulings—and regularly prevail, although the process might sometimes take decades. From the common misreading of Marbury v. Madison, to the mistaken understanding of the Supreme Court as the trusted guardian of individual rights, to the questionable assumptions of the Court's decision in Citizens United, Fisher’s work charts the distance and the difference between the Court as the ultimate arbiter in constitutional matters and the judgment of history. The verdict of Reconsidering Judicial Finality is clear: to treat the Supreme Court’s nine justices as democracy’s last hope or as dangerous activists undermining democracy is to vest them with undue significance. The Constitution belongs to all three branches of government—and, finally, to the American people.
Nomor Panggil11 REC lou
PenulisLouis Fisher
PenerbitUniversity Press of Kansas
Kolasixvii, 262p.; 23.5cm
BahasaEnglish
Klasifikasi11 REC lou
ISBN/ISSN9780700628100
Edisi
Tanggal Terbit2019
TopikLaw

Rekomendasi Lainnya

Cover A Court of Specialists: Judicial Behavior on the UK Supreme Court
Tersedia

A Court of Specialists: Judicial Behavior on the UK Supreme Court

Oxford University Press
Cover Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia
Tersedia

Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia

Melbourne University Publishing
Cover Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from Around the World
Tersedia

Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from Around the World

University of Toronto Press
Cover Penegakan dan Penguatan Integritas Peradilan
Tersedia

Penegakan dan Penguatan Integritas Peradilan

Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia
Cover Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Komisi Yudisial, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Etika
Tersedia

Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Komisi Yudisial, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Etika

Gava Media
Cover Etika Profesi Hukum
Tersedia

Etika Profesi Hukum

Prenada Media Group
Cover Diskresi Pejabat Publik dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Tersedia

Diskresi Pejabat Publik dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

CV Keni Media
Cover Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution
Tersedia

Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution

University Press of Kansas
Cover Peninjauan Kembali: Koreksi Kesalahan dalam Putusan
Tersedia

Peninjauan Kembali: Koreksi Kesalahan dalam Putusan

Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia
Cover Pucuk Pimpinan Mahkamah Yudisial Bicara
Tersedia

Pucuk Pimpinan Mahkamah Yudisial Bicara

Tempo Publishing